Täglicher Archiv: regenerative agriculture

Wie kann die Modeindustrie ihre Nachhaltigkeitsziele voranbringen?

How Can Fashion Industry Make Progress in Sustainability in 2022

German version

As we look back on the last couple of years, we have seen some great trends and movements emerge in fashion. People got crafty, got political, started putting more thought into what we buy and who we buy from. An increasing amount of people now prioritise sustainability when buying fashion items. 

However, the fashion industry still has a lot to work on. The industry is responsible for around 40 million tonnes of textile waste a year, most of which are either sent to landfills or incinerated. Emissions are still rising, circularity remains elusive, and sustainable textiles have yet to scale. The fashion industry must shift its focus from doing less harm to doing more good. 

The good news is, small brands are offering more solutions and leading fashion towards a fundamental change. People who run small brands do seem to think differently and are able to do better flexibly. Measured strictly by total environmental impact, many small brands automatically perform better than large ones; their size means they are likely to use fewer resources and produce less waste

What’s needed is a systemic change that would allow people and companies to work toward a common goal rooted in what sustainability means; the ability for society to meet people’s basic needs and express their greatest potential and talent. The future of sustainability in fashion lies in regenerative agriculture, durable and long-lasting designs, closed-loop and biodegradable packaging, and cross-industry collaborations are also lighting the way to a more sustainable future.

 

How Can Fashion Industry Make Progress in Sustainability in 2022

Regenerative Sourcing

Regenerative agriculture is set to be “the solution” for sustainable and responsible sourcing for many industries. Regenerative farming practices actively IMPROVE ecosystem including the soil quality, biodiversity, reinvigorating soil so that it can sequester carbon. 

In terms of business strategy, the long-term goal should be to encourage local fibre farms or communities to grow more soil-friendly fibres such as flax or hemp and work towards the Regenerative Organic Alliance’s ROC certification for fibres such as cotton, wool and cashmere. 

It is important to note that, in order for a business to move toward regenerative sourcing, all employees in the business need to understand the agricultural practices and share the same value. The education not only makes it easier for the business to successfully implement the strategy but also empower the employees with knowledge and the ability to prioritise regenerative natural materials. 

 

Track and Trace

Not only that track and trace technology will help rebuild trust and transparency in the supply chain, being able to trace fibre usage allows brands to measure business’ progress on carbon-based targets. 

Perhaps in the future, transparency and level of carbon-neutrality determine a business’s tax rate or access to loans and investors. 

Decarbonising the supply chain is a complicated challenge and it’s overwhelming for brand owners. A good place to start would be to analyse the biggest fibre usage, track its impact via third-party certifications all the way from the raw material to post-consumer end of life. If the whole industry devotes itself to actually achieving it, the process will need to be so sweeping that it will inherently tackle some of fashion’s other problems along the way such as waste and overuse of hazardous chemicals.

 

Responsible Design

Fashion brands are starting to realise that growth in terms of volume of items and speed has often come at the expense of design and relationships with customers while leaving unwanted or unsold products. Designers must consider design practice as a tool to tackle issues, ensure suitability and relevance to the consumers, and products’ end of life including reuse recycling or reselling. 

Practical items that offer multiple uses will appeal to cost-conscious, post-pandemic consumers. Focus on cost-per-wear metrics would drive versatile items such as reversible and trans-seasonal clothing. Paying attention to the smallest details can drastically reduce the overall carbon footprint such as reducing unnecessary components or switching to biodegradable thread. 

Collaborations are now embedded into the fashion industry’s culture. They can be truly progressive and signal how to design a better future when they spark innovation and transmit knowledge, whether keeping traditional skills alive or bringing cutting-edge innovations to the market. New developments in AI technology may make it possible in the future for consumers to be measured by web camera when shopping online and for the garment to be made to their measurements. This is an important step towards a fashion industry that saves resources and produces less waste.

How Can Fashion Industry Make Progress in Sustainability in 2022

Reevaluating Packaging

The growth of e-commerce is already problematic from a sustainability standpoint, high environmental-impact packaging needs to be tackled. It means looking at everything from carriers, garment poly bags and boxes. 

Organisations such as The Sustainable Packaging Coalition, whose members encompass the entire supply chain, and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s initiative, New Plastic Economy, which aims to support companies in making the plastics sector more circular may deliver new solutions in this field/area. Moreover, tackling these issues now means that companies stay ahead of evolving packaging policy. Governments are adopting legislation targeted at companies to tackle their waste.

“Climate change is not only about emissions. It’s about a system that has been benefiting some at the expense of the vast majority of people on the planet and the planet itself“- Muhammad Malas, senior climate campaigner for advocacy group Stand.earth.

 

A lot of brands are growing while maintaining responsible practices and collaborating with others that share the same value, especially in the Scandinavian region. One of the Scandinavian “it” brands Ganni has been working with (Di)vision, which started out upcycling vintage clothes into one-of-a-kind pieces. to develop a business system that embraces scarcity through frequent drops limited in volume, to accommodate the use of deadstock while still growing the business. As the business grew, (Di)vision realised that upcycled pieces don’t work for a big e-commerce business. The brand now uses deadstock luxury fabric for 90% of production, creating seasonal collections with fabrics from factories in Italy, including leftover fabrics from Rick Owens, Gucci and Jil Sander,

Scandinavian young designers emphasise the lack of competition between each other since they are all working towards the same goal together. How wonderful would it be if the global fashion industry works that way?

Shop the look

l’amour est bleu Kleid Modell Amalia

l’amour est bleu Kimono Jacke Modell Adele

l’amour est bleu Strickpullover Modell Alek

l’amour est bleu Strickjogger Modell Wek

Ältere Beiträge

Entdecke die Kollektion

SHOP
Wie kann die Modeindustrie ihre Nachhaltigkeitsziele voranbringen?

Wie kann die Modeindustrie ihre Nachhaltigkeitsziele voranbringen?


English version

Wenn wir auf die letzten paar Jahre zurückblicken, haben wir großartige Trends und Bewegungen in der Mode gesehen. Menschen entdeckten die Handarbeit, wurden politisch und fingen an, sich mehr Gedanken darüber zu machen, was und von wem sie etwas kaufen. Immer mehr Menschen legen beim Bekleidungskonsum Wert auf Nachhaltigkeit. 

Allerdings hat die Modeindustrie noch einiges zu tun. Die Branche ist für rund 40 Millionen Tonnen Textilabfälle pro Jahr verantwortlich, von denen die meisten entweder auf Mülldeponien landen oder verbrannt werden. Die Emissionen steigen weiter an, die Kreislaufwirtschaft ist nach wie vor schwer greifbar, und nachhaltige Textilien müssen sich nach wie vor noch bei der Masse durchsetzen. Die Modeindustrie muss sich darauf konzentrieren, weniger Schaden anzurichten und mehr Gutes zu tun. 

Die gute Nachricht ist, dass junge Modelabels neue Lösungsansätze finden und die Modebranche in Richtung eines grundlegenden Wandels führen. Kleine Modelabels scheinen anders zu denken und sind in der Lage, flexibler zu handeln. Gemessen an ihren Umweltauswirkungen schneiden viele kleine Modeunternehmen besser ab als große Unternehmen, weil sie aufgrund ihres Geschäftsmodells weniger Ressourcen verbrauchen und weniger Abfall produzieren

Wir brauchen einen systemischen Wandel, der es Menschen und Unternehmen ermöglicht, auf ein gemeinsames Ziel hinzuarbeiten, welches die Definition einer nachhaltigen Gesellschaft aufgreift – nämlich dass umweltbezogene, wirtschaftliche und soziale Ziele gleichzeitig und gleichberechtigt umgesetzt werden. Die nachhaltige Zukunft der Mode liegt in der regenerativen Landwirtschaft, in haltbaren und zeitlosen Kleidungsstücken, geschlossenen Kreisläufen und biologisch abbaubaren Verpackungen sowie branchenübergreifende Kooperationen, die bei der Umsetzung dieser Ziele behilflich sind.

 

How Can Fashion Industry Make Progress in Sustainability in 2022




Regenerative Beschaffung

Regenerative Landwirtschaft wird für viele Industrien “die Zukunftslösung” für eine nachhaltige und verantwortungsvolle Beschaffung sein. Regenerative Anbaumethoden verbessern aktiv das Ökosystem, einschließlich der Bodenqualität, biologischen Vielfalt und Regeneration des Bodens, so dass er CO2 aus der Umgebung abbauen kann. 

In Bezug auf die Geschäftsstrategie sollte das langfristige Ziel darin bestehen, lokale Textilhersteller oder -verbände zu ermutigen, bodenfreundlichere Fasern wie Flachs oder Hanf anzubauen und auf die ROC-Zertifizierung der Regenerative Organic Alliance für Fasern wie Baumwolle, Wolle und Kaschmir hinzuarbeiten. 

Damit ein Unternehmen zu einer regenerativen Beschaffung übergehen kann, ist es wichtig, dass alle Mitarbeiter eines Unternehmens die landwirtschaftlichen Praktiken verstehen und die gleichen Werte teilen. Die Schulung seiner Mitarbeiter erleichtert dem Unternehmen nicht nur die erfolgreiche Umsetzung der Strategie, sondern befähigt auch die Mitarbeiter, die Gründe für erneuerbare Naturmaterialien nachzuvollziehen.

 




Nach- und Rückverfolgung

Die Track-and-Trace-Technologie trägt nicht nur dazu bei, das die Transparenz und das Kundenvertrauen  in der Lieferkette wiederherzustellen, sondern sie ermöglicht es auch den Modeunternehmen u.a. ihren Rohstoffverbrauch oder ihre Fortschritte bei der Reduzierung ihrer CO2-Emissionen zu messen. Vielleicht werden Lieferkettentransparenz und CO2-Ausgleich die zukünftige Währung eines Unternehmens für den Zugang zu Krediten und Investoren. 

Die CO2-neutrale Lieferkette ist eine komplizierte Herausforderung, die für Modeunternehmen schwer umsetzbar ist. Ein Ansatz wäre die Analyse des Hauptmaterialverbrauchs und die Messung der Umweltauswirkungen über den gesamten Lebenszyklus vom Rohmaterial bis zum Ende der Nutzungsdauer. Bei der Messung und Auswertung können externe Unternehmen zur Unterstützung herangezogen werden. Wenn sich die gesamte Modebranche diesem Ziel verschreibt, muss der Prozess so weitreichend sein, dass er auch andere Probleme der Modeindustrie wie z.B. Abfall und Verwendung gefährlicher Chemikalien berücksichtigt.

 




Verantwortungsvolles Design

Modemarken erkennen allmählich, dass das Mengen Getriebene und schnelle Wachstum auf Kosten des Designs und der Kundenbeziehung geht und dadurch viele Restbestände entstehen. Designer müssen das Entwerfen von Bekleidung als Methode zur Lösung des Problems betrachten: Es ist deren Aufgabe, für die Konsumenten den Bedarf, eine lange Lebensdauer der Textilien sowie deren Wiederverwendung, -verwertung oder -verkauf sicherzustellen.

Praktische Kleidungsstücke, die vielseitige Tragemöglichkeiten bieten, haben das Potenzial preissensible, post-pandemische Verbraucher anzusprechen. Der Fokus auf die “Kosten-pro-Kleidungsstück” wäre vorteilhaft für vielseitige und saisonübergreifende Kleidung, weil sich die initial höhere Investition beim mehrmaligen Tragen des Kleidungsstücks relativieren würde. Bei der Reduktion des gesamten CO2-Fußabdrucks eines Designs kann die Berücksichtigung kleinster Details, wie z.B. die Reduzierung unnötiger Komponenten oder die Verwendung von biologisch abbaubarem Garn große Auswirkungen haben.

Kooperationen sind heute fester Bestandteil in der Modeindustrie. Viele sind bereits sehr fortschrittlich und zukunftsweisend, indem innovative Methoden traditionelle ablösen oder neue bahnbrechende Verfahren die Industrie revolutionieren. Neue Entwicklungen in der AI-Technologie können es zukünftig ermöglichen, dass Konsumenten beim Online-Shoppen per Webkamera vermessen und das Kleidungsstück auf ihre Maße hergestellt werden kann. Ein wichtiger Schritt in Richtung einer Modeindustrie, die ressourcenschonender wirtschaftet und weniger Abfall produziert.

 





How Can Fashion Industry Make Progress in Sustainability in 2022




Neuentwicklung des Verpackungsmaterials

Das rasante Wachstum des Online-Shoppings ist unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Nachhaltigkeit äußerst problematisch. Vor allem Versandverpackungen haben negative Auswirkungen auf die Umwelt, weshalb sie vom Plastikversandbeutel bis hin zum Versandkarton Optimierungsbedarf haben. 

Organisationen wie The Sustainable Packaging Coalition, deren Mitglieder die gesamte Lieferkette abdecken, und die Initiative New Plastic Economy der Ellen MacArthur Foundation, die Unternehmen dabei unterstützen will, den Kunststoffsektor kreislauffähiger zu machen, können auf diesem Feld neue Lösungen liefern. Wenn Unternehmen diese Probleme jetzt angehen, können sie der Verpackungspolitik einen Schritt voraus sein. Weltweit verabschieden Regierungen aktuell Gesetze, die Unternehmen dazu verpflichten ihre Abfälle zu reduzieren. 

 

“Beim Klimawandel geht es nicht nur um Emissionen. Es geht um ein System, in dem einige Wenige profitieren, und das auf Kosten der großen Mehrheit und des Planeten selbst.” – Muhammad Malas, leitender Klimaaktivist der Interessensgruppe Stand.earth.

 

Insbesondere in Skandinavien wachsen viele Modeunternehmen, während sie verantwortungsvolle Praktiken einführen und mit anderen Unternehmen Kooperationen eingehen, die dieselben Werte wie sie teilen. Die skandinavische “It”-Marke, Ganni, hat mit (Di)vision zusammengearbeitet – ein Unternehmen, das aus dem Upcycling von Vintage-Kleidung ein Geschäftsmodell entwickelt hat. Sie wuchsen über ein erfolgreiches Verknappungsprinzip, indem sie limitierte Upcycling-Kollektionen heraus brachten und gleichzeitig Restbestände in Form von gebrauchter Vintage-Kleidung wiederverwerteten. Als das Unternehmen wuchs, erkannte (Di)vision, dass sich geupcycelte Kleidungsstücke nicht für ein großes E-Commerce-Unternehmen eignen. Das Unternehmen verwendet nun für 90 % seiner neuen Kollektionen luxuriöse Deadstock-Stoffe aus italienischen Textilfabriken, die u.a. Stoffe für Rick Owens, Gucci und Jil Sander produzieren.

Die jungen skandinavischen Designer betonen, dass sie untereinander nicht konkurrieren, da sie alle gemeinsam auf das gleiche Ziel hinarbeiten. Wäre es nicht wünschenswert, dass die globale Modeindustrie auf diese Weise arbeitet?

 



Shop the look




l’amour est bleu Bluse Modell Viola




l’amour est bleu Kimono Jacke Modell Adele






l’amour est bleu Hose Modell Laura




l’amour est bleu Hose Modell Greta




Ältere Beiträge





Entdecke die Kollektion


SHOP


l'amour est bleu Blog - Black Friday zum Green Friday machen

Turning Black Friday Green


German version

The festive season is finally here and the next Friday is the Black Friday everyone loves. It might be difficult to see past the excitement of being offered huge discounts. It’s seductive but it is nothing more than an unofficial holiday that celebrates consumerism. Black Friday and Cyber Monday (which happens on the following Monday) are one of the most profitable times of the year for retailers. They are the time of year that the fashion industry encourages hyper-consumption with heavily-discounted marketing which leads people into buying things they don’t need just for the safe of a bargain. It generates huge volumes of waste as items are returned or thrown away after a short period of time, contributing to throw-away culture.




In 2017 European retailers experienced a 261% increase in turnover on Black Friday compared to an average day. Last year saw brands offering huge discounts to get rid of the mountains of unsold stock left from the global pandemic when physical stores were forced to be closed for months. As a result, consumers spent $9 billion online shopping during Black Friday in 2020, making last year’s the most polluting ever.

Overconsumption also has an enormous human toll especially when items bought are from fast fashion and unethical brands, perpetuating unsafe working conditions, extreme poverty, and political instability/war in producing countries.

 

In the UK alone, Black Friday 2020 emitted 429,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions – that’s equivalent to 435 return flights from London to New York.

 

The promise of free shipping or returns on fashion retail sites has long been the norm, but what is commonly touted as “free” is far from free when you consider the environmental cost. Online orders of clothes and shoes typically have an online return rate of 30 to 40% (compared to 5 to 10% of in-store purchases) which creates extra carbon emission by sending an item from a warehouse to the customer, then the other way around. The environmental cost of transporting just one item using a courier is 181g of CO2. In the UK alone, Black Friday 2020 emitted 429,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions – that’s equivalent to 435 return flights from London to New York.




To make it worse, the majority of brands send returned items straight to landfill or incineration. Luxury brands, for example, has been criticised for throwing deadstocks and returned items away to avoid risk damaging the prestige of their brand by selling at a discount. While all customers certainly have the right to return an item that isn’t suitable for them, that doesn’t mean that the industry should encourage the harmful practice of excessive returns and consumers shouldn’t abuse the system by buying items knowing that they will be returned surely.

Another issue is that e-commerce giants with $1 billion annual sales perform better than smaller shops during Black Friday. In 2019, while 93.2 million consumers made a purchase online on Black Friday, Amazon counted for 50.9% of all sales on Black Friday in the U.S. And while smaller online retailers have only seen a 27% growth, online giants have seen a 62% boost in sales.

Perhaps things are starting to look better, though. With all the climate change protests and the declaration of climate change emergencies by countries around the world, consumers are starting to re-evaluate their shopping habits. According to new research, 67% of UK consumers are going to pay attention to the sustainability efforts of retail brands during Black Friday, Cyber Monday and Christmas shopping. And 78% of UK shoppers stated that whether or not brands clearly communicate their sustainability efforts will have “somewhat” of an impact over where they will shop, and 47% stated that they aren’t planning to spend during the Black Friday weekend.





l'amour est bleu fair fashion to fall in love with

Black Friday at l’amour est bleu

As a sustainable brand, we believe we must approach things differently and encourage people to shop and consume fashion locally and sustainably. We want people to know that every one of your mindful purchases can create a great impact on the community and the environment.

By buying a sustainable item from a local, actually sustainable brand (instead of buying clothes from “conscious collection” from H&M), you can empower the people in the supply chain, minimise the environmental harm, support local, independent businesses while keeping the money within your community or region, instead of giving the profit to multi-national companies abroad, and there are more positive impacts that could be generated by a single mindful purchase. It is truly amazing to see so much positive change on the horizon.

On Black Friday this year, we decided to sell returned items and samples at a discounted price. Doing so allows us to avoid wasting returned items, all these items required natural and human resources to be produced and we want them to be worn and enjoyed by our customers. And we trust our customers will cherish our garments that are sewn by seamstresses in Berlin from sustainable materials as well as make them last.

And please keep in mind, there’s nothing wrong to purchase a sustainable item you have been wanting and waiting for to be on sale, however, it’s problematic to purchase unsustainable items, especially from fast-fashion retailers, just because it’s on sale.

To shop our ARCHIVE SALE, you will need to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the acces link. You can subscribe for the newsletter here: https://lamourestbleu.com.

Also, if you’d like to learn more about the environmental impact of online shopping, check out our blog post here.



Older posts





SHOP FAIR FASHION


SHOP


l'amour est bleu Gründerin & Designerin Thien Huynh

Made-to-Order Fashion: The Solution To Fashion’s Overproduction and Waste Issues


German version

The fashion industry, responsible for 10% of the world’s carbon emissions, is facing broader pressure to reduce its environmental impact. Somewhere between 80 to 150 billion individual garments are produced every year globally, a doubling in only 15 years, and only 15% of it is recycled or donated. Every second, a garbage truck’s worth of clothing and textiles gets incinerated or tossed in a landfill, according to a 2017 report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. To make things worse, most of these garments are made of synthetic materials, which are derived from oil and petroleum production. Unlike natural materials like cotton or wool, synergic fibres don’t biodegrade, so they will be sitting in the landfill for over 200 years.

Undervalued and expensive dead inventory is estimated to cost the US retail industry as much as $50 billion dollars a year. Given that this already represents a great expense for brands, it’s unlikely that many of them are genuinely concerned about the added cost of responsibly recycling their dead stock either. This is why H&M destroyed $4.3 billion worth of unworn clothing and Burberry burnt £28 million of stock as we found out back in 2018. 

The pandemic has also thrown up plenty of hurdles to making and shipping products. Global transportation bottlenecks have slowed the time it takes a product to make it from the factory to the customer from a few weeks to two-and-a-half months. Lockdowns have forced brands to close their retail stores, sales have gone down and they struggled to get rid of their stocks. 

The fashion industry is in the midst of a supply chain crisis as a result of globalisation and due to the pandemic and restrictions. Brand’s are searching for alternative business models that are more sustainable and efficient while less dead inventory weighing on their shoulders.


Made-to-Order Fashion: The Fashion’s Solution To Overproduction and Waste Issues

Image via Unsplash





The Fashion Industry is Changing

Alternatives are slowly gaining popularity. Some fashion brands have adopted business models that help them change their approach to excess material and inventory, including incorporating the use of headstock fabrics and made-to-order models. Young designers and small brands are turning away from the traditional fashion business model and calendars in an effort to produce more sustainably. They avoid overproduction altogether by only producing what’s going to be sold, and often keeping the production geographically close.

Made-to-order means that manufacturing will only begin once a customer places the order, rather than producing garments without any insurance that they will sell. This drastically helps to reduce the levels of the surplus stock ending up in landfills. 

It’s about going back to the way it used to be. Up until the mid-to-late 20th Century, people either made their own clothes or purchased items made uniquely for themselves. People know who made their clothes, who made the fabric, and how much resources went into producing the clothes.

However, since the arrival of fast fashion, we have lost the connection with the clothes we wear. Nobody knows where their clothes come from or who made them. Even the brands who sold the clothes don’t know where their products came from. Clothes are now considered disposable items which have created a throw-away culture in consumers. 

 

Made-to-Order Fashion: The Fashion’s Solution To Overproduction and Waste Issues

Image via Unsplash




 

Adopting Made-to-Order Model at l’amour est bleu

At l’amour est bleu, we have adopted the made-to-order business model because we believe that the model helps us to reduce waste and reliance on natural resources which is the key to operating a sustainable fashion business. The Made-to-order model also allows us to offer customers customised or made-to-measure garments to the customer’s specifications – down to the size, colour, detailing and even add-ons such as zippers. It ensures that the garment fits the customer perfectly.

Of course, made-to-order means that customers will have to wait longer for their garments. In an age where consumers can get anything at their door the next day they place the order with a click of a mouse, the concept of made-to-order requires a mind-ship for some consumers. But we don’t want to just produce sustainable garments, but also educate the consumers and allow them to purchase and consume fashion items sustainably more. 

There’s something special about the experience of having a garment made for you, the concept offers an emotional value to the consumer that fast fashion brands cannot offer. The emotional connection with the garment makes the consumer appreciate and cherish it more and is likely to keep the garment for a long time. According to the Clean Clothes Campaign, a staggering 100 billion garments are produced each year and 3 out of 5 of them will end up in landfills within a year. To keep all of our garments out of the landfills, we must make our clothes last. 

With this article, we’d like to share our journey with you by interviewing the founder of l’amour est bleu, Thien Huynh.





l'amour est bleu Gründerin & Designerin Thien Huynh

Founder of l’amour est bleu, Thien Huyhn

 

  • What was the reason why you decided to change your business model and adopt made-to-order?

Already in the founding phase of l’amour est bleu, the made-to-order model came to my mind. I didn’t know it was called made-to-order at the time, I was just thinking about how I could produce fashion in the most sustainable way. But when I shared my idea with friends, I only got negative feedback and they told me that in a time when Zalando and Amazon deliver the next day, nobody would be willing to wait for 2 to 3 weeks for their garment. So I lost heart and pre-produced the first three collections as all fashion companies do.

After the third collection, I was overcome with dissatisfaction because I could not sell many garments and they were piling up more and more. To be honest, I no longer had the financial means to pre-produce a new collection, so I gathered my courage and dared to offer the new collection Made-to-order. The current events with H&M and Burberry, which were burning billions of euros worth of clothing, also benefited me so that I could promote the made-to-order model as the sustainable future of fashion. And the concept worked: We started with a delivery time of 2 weeks and customers accepted it. The first made-to-order collection was much more successful than the previous ones and since then we offer all collections according to the made-to-order model.

 

  • What are the biggest advantages and disadvantages of the made-to-order model?

The biggest advantages are the sustainable aspect and the personalisation for the customer. We only produce the garments in the colours and sizes that the customer really wants, so we have very few surpluses. Of course, we also have returns, but within a manageable framework.

The made-to-order model is resource-saving in every respect: no surplus is produced and the tailors don’t work for free either.

Normally, every new collection requires a lot of work because the cuts are made for all sizes and then garments are produced in all sizes and colours. For us, only size S is sewn as a sample as standard and we create the remaining sizes on request. Other colour variations are retouched on the photos using Photoshop and we only order the fabrics when a customer orders a new colour variation. The made-to-order model allows all parties involved not to work “for free”.

Another advantage is our high flexibility to respond to customer requests. We can make any garment to measure or customise it to fit the customer best. This service is well received and I am happy to produce perfectly fitting garments for customers that they really enjoy wearing. At the same time, through close interaction with our customers, we can quickly improve new models and thus reduce our returns. 

The downside of the made-to-order model is that we have to move very quickly to meet our 10-day delivery time. This summer we received more orders than ever before and at the same time we had structural changes in production as well as staff restrictions and delivery delays due to the pandemic. It made my stomach hurt, but our customers showed great understanding for the most part.

 

  • Would you ever consider going back to the ready-to-wear model?

Never. I had briefly thought about pre-producing basics and bestsellers to convince more “normal” customers of our sustainable fashion. But since the pandemic, the attitude of many consumers has changed and we even sell basics with a delivery time of 10 days. Let’s see how consumer buying behaviour develops, but I am happy about this positive development away from fast fashion.

 

  • If a brand owner is considering incorporating a made-to-order model, what’s your advice? 

My suggestion would be to really make it 100%. It takes courage, especially if you have pre-produced beforehand. But you can only benefit from the advantages mentioned before if you really do it 100%. For this, it is very important to have well-functioning processes so that your business can easily grow with the demand. We noticed with the growing demand that our processes were not working smoothly and we had to improve them afterwards, which caused a lot of headaches, especially for me.




It is still a learning-by-doing process for us because we are pioneers and have hardly any role models to learn from..




Moving Forward…

The made-to-order model certainly has a significant role to play in moving towards a more sustainable fashion industry. It is a far more ethical and sustainable approach because there is no overproduction, reducing the risk of excess unwanted stock going to landfills. It also avoids encouraging a culture of buying more and more new items and discarding them at rapid speed. Instead, it promotes slow fashion and the love for a garment that is well-made just for the customer.

What are your thoughts on made-to-order fashion? Let us know what you think!



Older posts





SHOP FAIR FASHION


SHOP


Regenerative agriculture and non-GM seeds are making the cotton production more sustainable

Two Factors Making the Cotton Production More Sustainable


German version

Nowadays, organic cotton is not just for rich people but is for everyone who understands the importance of sustainability. Organic cotton plays an important role in protecting all livings from the impacts of chemicals and climate change as well as ensuring safe and fair working conditions for the people in the supply chain. 

There was significant growth in global production of organic cotton from 2018 to 2019 by 56%. Facilities certified to leading voluntary organic textile standards also grew significantly between 2018 to 2019 by 48% for Organic Cotton Standard and 35% for Global Organic Textile Standard. As a result, 2018/19 saw the second biggest harvest of organic cotton ever recorded. The increasing demand for organic cotton brings tremendous benefits to the ecosystem.

Organic cotton production is a ‘proof of concept’ for the significant and strengthening focus and effort on restorative and regenerative practices for agriculture. Rebuilding soil health, water cycles, protecting biodiversity both above and below soil across our working lands is essential for our future and is key to the nature-based approaches that comprise over 30% of solution for climate change. 

With this article, we would like to look at the importance of regenerative agriculture and non-GM seed in cotton production and how they can help us combat climate change.

 




Understanding Regenerative Agriculture 

Regenerative agriculture is an approach in agriculture that rejects pesticides and synthetic fertiliser and is a holistic philosophy that aims at positively influencing bio-sequestration, biodiversity, eco-toxicity, climate resilience, water systems, micronutrients, and ecosystem services. The benefits of regenerative agriculture are endless! 

Let me explain the difference between regenerative agriculture and organic farming first!

Organic farming can assure you that the land which the product was grown was managed without the use of fertiliser and pesticides, however, it cannot tell you whether the health of the land is improving or not. While the intention is to promote ecological balance and conserve biodiversity, the system does not endeavour to rebuild or regenerate the soil. Still, it’s a million times better than conventional farming. Recently, a new “regenerative organic” certification was introduced to further incorporate management principles focused on the soil and its health. 

Conventional farming requires a massive amount of water, land, and pesticides. The U.S. agriculture industry emitted 698 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2018 alone. The damage to farm soil kicked into overdrive as farmers planted the same monoculture crops year after year and added more chemical fertilisers to make up for the sapped minerals and dead microbes. 

Organic farming and regenerative agriculture systems are known to be more effective than conventional systems at capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and sequestering it in the ground as soil organic matter. As a result, the soil carbon pool is approximately three times larger than the atmospheric pool. According to The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, sequestering CO2 with the power of healthy soil could potentially eliminate upwards of 250 million metric tonnes of CO2 annually.

Regenerative agriculture is not a ‘one size fit all’ practice because each farm or ranch differs based on unique natural resources, climate variability, and animal and ecological dynamics. Instead, farmers apply those principles for their particular region, operation and personal situation, and look at the combination of methods that support resilience as well as build and nourish our ecosystem. 

Over time, regenerative practices can increase production and naturally reduce the need for external inputs. When these regenerative practices are implemented successfully, the health of the agriculture ecosystem and farmer economic stability can be improved. 

 





Two factors making the cotton production more sustainable


Photo via Pexels






Why Non-GM Seed is Better Than GM Seed

The non-genetically modified seed that is suitable for growing organic cotton is crucial for ensuring both integrity and growth of organic cotton production. Within the global cotton land area of 32.9 million hectares, around 76% was planted with non-GM seeds in 2018. 

Genetically modified (GM) cotton was created to sustain an intensive agricultural system by reducing the use of pesticides, thereby limiting their farm to human health and the environment. Developed as a tool to improve pest management, it has been presented as a technology that will bring economic growth to cotton farming communities. However, there are several concerns with the technology and how it affects the environment, society and farmers’ financials especially regarding the long-term implications of introducing GM cotton. 

 

  • Economic Risks for Farmers

Research results still vary and economic benefits associated with GM crops have yet to be proven over the long term. Uncertainty about the financial benefits of GM adoption is one of the most significant risks to farmers who also experience ever-rising production costs and cotton price fluctuations on the global cotton market. GM crops can be a particularly costly risk to cash-poor farmers when a financial loss occurs as a result of crop failure, which could limit their ability to purchase GM seed and associated inputs. The inputs are often capital-intensive cotton farming production system, poses a significant risk of debt, bankruptcy, and even farmer suicides if returns do not pay off, especially for small farmers in countries that do not provide economic safety nets. 

 

  • Concerns over Resistance to Pesticides and Adverse Environmental Effects

With the increasing use of GM cotton comes concerns over the insect and weak resistance to pesticides. The ubiquitous use of toxins in GM cotton agriculture is already creating resistance among bollworms, and the emergence of secondary pests has been observed in India’s cotton production. The pest attacks can result in additional pesticide applications being needed, which comes with additional costs for production and environmental damage. 

A similar phenomenon can be observed with weeds becoming resistant to the herbicides used in combination with herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops. A review of 900 studies found that adoption of GM crops initially reduced the use of herbicides, but that resistant weeds later evolved, and resistance to herbicide glyphosate has led to creased usage of the herbicides. As a result, now farmers are spending more on seeds, more on fertiliser and more on insecticides. 

 

  • Monopoly and Seed Ownership Issues

The introduction of GM cotton has raised concerns about farmers’ dependence on the agrochemical industry. Farmers do not save GM seeds from previous harvests because GM cotton plants are F1 hybrids (i.g. the first generation offspring from two distinctly different parent plants). As a result, farmers planting GM cotton must buy new seeds each year to avoid having uneven paint types with lower production. They must also pay the technology fee associated with GM seeds. 

One study estimated that the one company alone owned up to 95% of the cotton seed market in India through its GM seeds. In 2018, 76% of conventional cotton production worldwide was genetically modified. The introduction of GM cotton also has disconnected farmers from the plant breeding process, risk the loss of agricultural know-how that has been passed down for centuries. 

 




Supporting Organic Cotton Can Make Our Future Brighter 

While organic cotton was once seen as a “niche,” today, brands of all sizes are marking its major components of their fibre and material portfolio. More and more brands and retailers are setting targets and making commitments to increase their use of organic cotton, encouraged by growing evidence of the sustainability benefits of fibre and organic farming. 




Through empowering the agricultural community, we believe that we have the capacity and potential to tackle the challenges the agricultural sector is facing today.




If you’d like to learn about the social issues of cotton production in China and India, you can read this article: “Cotton Production; Social Issues in China and India

What are your thoughts on organic cotton, regenerative agriculture and non-GM seeds? Let us know what you think!



Older posts





SHOP FAIR FASHION


SHOP