Täglicher Archiv: nonGMseed

l'amour est bleu Blog - Black Friday zum Green Friday machen

Turning Black Friday Green

German version

The festive season is finally here and the next Friday is the Black Friday everyone loves. It might be difficult to see past the excitement of being offered huge discounts. It’s seductive but it is nothing more than an unofficial holiday that celebrates consumerism. Black Friday and Cyber Monday (which happens on the following Monday) are one of the most profitable times of the year for retailers. They are the time of year that the fashion industry encourages hyper-consumption with heavily-discounted marketing which leads people into buying things they don’t need just for the safe of a bargain. It generates huge volumes of waste as items are returned or thrown away after a short period of time, contributing to throw-away culture.

In 2017 European retailers experienced a 261% increase in turnover on Black Friday compared to an average day. Last year saw brands offering huge discounts to get rid of the mountains of unsold stock left from the global pandemic when physical stores were forced to be closed for months. As a result, consumers spent $9 billion online shopping during Black Friday in 2020, making last year’s the most polluting ever.

Overconsumption also has an enormous human toll especially when items bought are from fast fashion and unethical brands, perpetuating unsafe working conditions, extreme poverty, and political instability/war in producing countries.

 

In the UK alone, Black Friday 2020 emitted 429,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions – that’s equivalent to 435 return flights from London to New York.

 

The promise of free shipping or returns on fashion retail sites has long been the norm, but what is commonly touted as “free” is far from free when you consider the environmental cost. Online orders of clothes and shoes typically have an online return rate of 30 to 40% (compared to 5 to 10% of in-store purchases) which creates extra carbon emission by sending an item from a warehouse to the customer, then the other way around. The environmental cost of transporting just one item using a courier is 181g of CO2. In the UK alone, Black Friday 2020 emitted 429,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions – that’s equivalent to 435 return flights from London to New York.

To make it worse, the majority of brands send returned items straight to landfill or incineration. Luxury brands, for example, has been criticised for throwing deadstocks and returned items away to avoid risk damaging the prestige of their brand by selling at a discount. While all customers certainly have the right to return an item that isn’t suitable for them, that doesn’t mean that the industry should encourage the harmful practice of excessive returns and consumers shouldn’t abuse the system by buying items knowing that they will be returned surely.

Another issue is that e-commerce giants with $1 billion annual sales perform better than smaller shops during Black Friday. In 2019, while 93.2 million consumers made a purchase online on Black Friday, Amazon counted for 50.9% of all sales on Black Friday in the U.S. And while smaller online retailers have only seen a 27% growth, online giants have seen a 62% boost in sales.

Perhaps things are starting to look better, though. With all the climate change protests and the declaration of climate change emergencies by countries around the world, consumers are starting to re-evaluate their shopping habits. According to new research, 67% of UK consumers are going to pay attention to the sustainability efforts of retail brands during Black Friday, Cyber Monday and Christmas shopping. And 78% of UK shoppers stated that whether or not brands clearly communicate their sustainability efforts will have “somewhat” of an impact over where they will shop, and 47% stated that they aren’t planning to spend during the Black Friday weekend.

l'amour est bleu fair fashion to fall in love with

Black Friday at l’amour est bleu

As a sustainable brand, we believe we must approach things differently and encourage people to shop and consume fashion locally and sustainably. We want people to know that every one of your mindful purchases can create a great impact on the community and the environment.

By buying a sustainable item from a local, actually sustainable brand (instead of buying clothes from “conscious collection” from H&M), you can empower the people in the supply chain, minimise the environmental harm, support local, independent businesses while keeping the money within your community or region, instead of giving the profit to multi-national companies abroad, and there are more positive impacts that could be generated by a single mindful purchase. It is truly amazing to see so much positive change on the horizon.

On Black Friday this year, we decided to sell returned items and samples at a discounted price. Doing so allows us to avoid wasting returned items, all these items required natural and human resources to be produced and we want them to be worn and enjoyed by our customers. And we trust our customers will cherish our garments that are sewn by seamstresses in Berlin from sustainable materials as well as make them last.

And please keep in mind, there’s nothing wrong to purchase a sustainable item you have been wanting and waiting for to be on sale, however, it’s problematic to purchase unsustainable items, especially from fast-fashion retailers, just because it’s on sale.

To shop our ARCHIVE SALE, you will need to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the acces link. You can subscribe for the newsletter here: https://lamourestbleu.com.

Also, if you’d like to learn more about the environmental impact of online shopping, check out our blog post here.

Older posts

SHOP FAIR FASHION

SHOP
l'amour est bleu Gründerin & Designerin Thien Huynh

Made-to-Order Fashion: The Solution To Fashion’s Overproduction and Waste Issues


German version

The fashion industry, responsible for 10% of the world’s carbon emissions, is facing broader pressure to reduce its environmental impact. Somewhere between 80 to 150 billion individual garments are produced every year globally, a doubling in only 15 years, and only 15% of it is recycled or donated. Every second, a garbage truck’s worth of clothing and textiles gets incinerated or tossed in a landfill, according to a 2017 report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. To make things worse, most of these garments are made of synthetic materials, which are derived from oil and petroleum production. Unlike natural materials like cotton or wool, synergic fibres don’t biodegrade, so they will be sitting in the landfill for over 200 years.

Undervalued and expensive dead inventory is estimated to cost the US retail industry as much as $50 billion dollars a year. Given that this already represents a great expense for brands, it’s unlikely that many of them are genuinely concerned about the added cost of responsibly recycling their dead stock either. This is why H&M destroyed $4.3 billion worth of unworn clothing and Burberry burnt £28 million of stock as we found out back in 2018. 

The pandemic has also thrown up plenty of hurdles to making and shipping products. Global transportation bottlenecks have slowed the time it takes a product to make it from the factory to the customer from a few weeks to two-and-a-half months. Lockdowns have forced brands to close their retail stores, sales have gone down and they struggled to get rid of their stocks. 

The fashion industry is in the midst of a supply chain crisis as a result of globalisation and due to the pandemic and restrictions. Brand’s are searching for alternative business models that are more sustainable and efficient while less dead inventory weighing on their shoulders.


Made-to-Order Fashion: The Fashion’s Solution To Overproduction and Waste Issues

Image via Unsplash





The Fashion Industry is Changing

Alternatives are slowly gaining popularity. Some fashion brands have adopted business models that help them change their approach to excess material and inventory, including incorporating the use of headstock fabrics and made-to-order models. Young designers and small brands are turning away from the traditional fashion business model and calendars in an effort to produce more sustainably. They avoid overproduction altogether by only producing what’s going to be sold, and often keeping the production geographically close.

Made-to-order means that manufacturing will only begin once a customer places the order, rather than producing garments without any insurance that they will sell. This drastically helps to reduce the levels of the surplus stock ending up in landfills. 

It’s about going back to the way it used to be. Up until the mid-to-late 20th Century, people either made their own clothes or purchased items made uniquely for themselves. People know who made their clothes, who made the fabric, and how much resources went into producing the clothes.

However, since the arrival of fast fashion, we have lost the connection with the clothes we wear. Nobody knows where their clothes come from or who made them. Even the brands who sold the clothes don’t know where their products came from. Clothes are now considered disposable items which have created a throw-away culture in consumers. 

 

Made-to-Order Fashion: The Fashion’s Solution To Overproduction and Waste Issues

Image via Unsplash




 

Adopting Made-to-Order Model at l’amour est bleu

At l’amour est bleu, we have adopted the made-to-order business model because we believe that the model helps us to reduce waste and reliance on natural resources which is the key to operating a sustainable fashion business. The Made-to-order model also allows us to offer customers customised or made-to-measure garments to the customer’s specifications – down to the size, colour, detailing and even add-ons such as zippers. It ensures that the garment fits the customer perfectly.

Of course, made-to-order means that customers will have to wait longer for their garments. In an age where consumers can get anything at their door the next day they place the order with a click of a mouse, the concept of made-to-order requires a mind-ship for some consumers. But we don’t want to just produce sustainable garments, but also educate the consumers and allow them to purchase and consume fashion items sustainably more. 

There’s something special about the experience of having a garment made for you, the concept offers an emotional value to the consumer that fast fashion brands cannot offer. The emotional connection with the garment makes the consumer appreciate and cherish it more and is likely to keep the garment for a long time. According to the Clean Clothes Campaign, a staggering 100 billion garments are produced each year and 3 out of 5 of them will end up in landfills within a year. To keep all of our garments out of the landfills, we must make our clothes last. 

With this article, we’d like to share our journey with you by interviewing the founder of l’amour est bleu, Thien Huynh.





l'amour est bleu Gründerin & Designerin Thien Huynh

Founder of l’amour est bleu, Thien Huyhn

 

  • What was the reason why you decided to change your business model and adopt made-to-order?

Already in the founding phase of l’amour est bleu, the made-to-order model came to my mind. I didn’t know it was called made-to-order at the time, I was just thinking about how I could produce fashion in the most sustainable way. But when I shared my idea with friends, I only got negative feedback and they told me that in a time when Zalando and Amazon deliver the next day, nobody would be willing to wait for 2 to 3 weeks for their garment. So I lost heart and pre-produced the first three collections as all fashion companies do.

After the third collection, I was overcome with dissatisfaction because I could not sell many garments and they were piling up more and more. To be honest, I no longer had the financial means to pre-produce a new collection, so I gathered my courage and dared to offer the new collection Made-to-order. The current events with H&M and Burberry, which were burning billions of euros worth of clothing, also benefited me so that I could promote the made-to-order model as the sustainable future of fashion. And the concept worked: We started with a delivery time of 2 weeks and customers accepted it. The first made-to-order collection was much more successful than the previous ones and since then we offer all collections according to the made-to-order model.

 

  • What are the biggest advantages and disadvantages of the made-to-order model?

The biggest advantages are the sustainable aspect and the personalisation for the customer. We only produce the garments in the colours and sizes that the customer really wants, so we have very few surpluses. Of course, we also have returns, but within a manageable framework.

The made-to-order model is resource-saving in every respect: no surplus is produced and the tailors don’t work for free either.

Normally, every new collection requires a lot of work because the cuts are made for all sizes and then garments are produced in all sizes and colours. For us, only size S is sewn as a sample as standard and we create the remaining sizes on request. Other colour variations are retouched on the photos using Photoshop and we only order the fabrics when a customer orders a new colour variation. The made-to-order model allows all parties involved not to work “for free”.

Another advantage is our high flexibility to respond to customer requests. We can make any garment to measure or customise it to fit the customer best. This service is well received and I am happy to produce perfectly fitting garments for customers that they really enjoy wearing. At the same time, through close interaction with our customers, we can quickly improve new models and thus reduce our returns. 

The downside of the made-to-order model is that we have to move very quickly to meet our 10-day delivery time. This summer we received more orders than ever before and at the same time we had structural changes in production as well as staff restrictions and delivery delays due to the pandemic. It made my stomach hurt, but our customers showed great understanding for the most part.

 

  • Would you ever consider going back to the ready-to-wear model?

Never. I had briefly thought about pre-producing basics and bestsellers to convince more “normal” customers of our sustainable fashion. But since the pandemic, the attitude of many consumers has changed and we even sell basics with a delivery time of 10 days. Let’s see how consumer buying behaviour develops, but I am happy about this positive development away from fast fashion.

 

  • If a brand owner is considering incorporating a made-to-order model, what’s your advice? 

My suggestion would be to really make it 100%. It takes courage, especially if you have pre-produced beforehand. But you can only benefit from the advantages mentioned before if you really do it 100%. For this, it is very important to have well-functioning processes so that your business can easily grow with the demand. We noticed with the growing demand that our processes were not working smoothly and we had to improve them afterwards, which caused a lot of headaches, especially for me.




It is still a learning-by-doing process for us because we are pioneers and have hardly any role models to learn from..




Moving Forward…

The made-to-order model certainly has a significant role to play in moving towards a more sustainable fashion industry. It is a far more ethical and sustainable approach because there is no overproduction, reducing the risk of excess unwanted stock going to landfills. It also avoids encouraging a culture of buying more and more new items and discarding them at rapid speed. Instead, it promotes slow fashion and the love for a garment that is well-made just for the customer.

What are your thoughts on made-to-order fashion? Let us know what you think!



Older posts





SHOP FAIR FASHION


SHOP


Regenerative agriculture and non-GM seeds are making the cotton production more sustainable

Two Factors Making the Cotton Production More Sustainable


German version

Nowadays, organic cotton is not just for rich people but is for everyone who understands the importance of sustainability. Organic cotton plays an important role in protecting all livings from the impacts of chemicals and climate change as well as ensuring safe and fair working conditions for the people in the supply chain. 

There was significant growth in global production of organic cotton from 2018 to 2019 by 56%. Facilities certified to leading voluntary organic textile standards also grew significantly between 2018 to 2019 by 48% for Organic Cotton Standard and 35% for Global Organic Textile Standard. As a result, 2018/19 saw the second biggest harvest of organic cotton ever recorded. The increasing demand for organic cotton brings tremendous benefits to the ecosystem.

Organic cotton production is a ‘proof of concept’ for the significant and strengthening focus and effort on restorative and regenerative practices for agriculture. Rebuilding soil health, water cycles, protecting biodiversity both above and below soil across our working lands is essential for our future and is key to the nature-based approaches that comprise over 30% of solution for climate change. 

With this article, we would like to look at the importance of regenerative agriculture and non-GM seed in cotton production and how they can help us combat climate change.

 




Understanding Regenerative Agriculture 

Regenerative agriculture is an approach in agriculture that rejects pesticides and synthetic fertiliser and is a holistic philosophy that aims at positively influencing bio-sequestration, biodiversity, eco-toxicity, climate resilience, water systems, micronutrients, and ecosystem services. The benefits of regenerative agriculture are endless! 

Let me explain the difference between regenerative agriculture and organic farming first!

Organic farming can assure you that the land which the product was grown was managed without the use of fertiliser and pesticides, however, it cannot tell you whether the health of the land is improving or not. While the intention is to promote ecological balance and conserve biodiversity, the system does not endeavour to rebuild or regenerate the soil. Still, it’s a million times better than conventional farming. Recently, a new “regenerative organic” certification was introduced to further incorporate management principles focused on the soil and its health. 

Conventional farming requires a massive amount of water, land, and pesticides. The U.S. agriculture industry emitted 698 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2018 alone. The damage to farm soil kicked into overdrive as farmers planted the same monoculture crops year after year and added more chemical fertilisers to make up for the sapped minerals and dead microbes. 

Organic farming and regenerative agriculture systems are known to be more effective than conventional systems at capturing CO2 from the atmosphere and sequestering it in the ground as soil organic matter. As a result, the soil carbon pool is approximately three times larger than the atmospheric pool. According to The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, sequestering CO2 with the power of healthy soil could potentially eliminate upwards of 250 million metric tonnes of CO2 annually.

Regenerative agriculture is not a ‘one size fit all’ practice because each farm or ranch differs based on unique natural resources, climate variability, and animal and ecological dynamics. Instead, farmers apply those principles for their particular region, operation and personal situation, and look at the combination of methods that support resilience as well as build and nourish our ecosystem. 

Over time, regenerative practices can increase production and naturally reduce the need for external inputs. When these regenerative practices are implemented successfully, the health of the agriculture ecosystem and farmer economic stability can be improved. 

 





Two factors making the cotton production more sustainable


Photo via Pexels






Why Non-GM Seed is Better Than GM Seed

The non-genetically modified seed that is suitable for growing organic cotton is crucial for ensuring both integrity and growth of organic cotton production. Within the global cotton land area of 32.9 million hectares, around 76% was planted with non-GM seeds in 2018. 

Genetically modified (GM) cotton was created to sustain an intensive agricultural system by reducing the use of pesticides, thereby limiting their farm to human health and the environment. Developed as a tool to improve pest management, it has been presented as a technology that will bring economic growth to cotton farming communities. However, there are several concerns with the technology and how it affects the environment, society and farmers’ financials especially regarding the long-term implications of introducing GM cotton. 

 

  • Economic Risks for Farmers

Research results still vary and economic benefits associated with GM crops have yet to be proven over the long term. Uncertainty about the financial benefits of GM adoption is one of the most significant risks to farmers who also experience ever-rising production costs and cotton price fluctuations on the global cotton market. GM crops can be a particularly costly risk to cash-poor farmers when a financial loss occurs as a result of crop failure, which could limit their ability to purchase GM seed and associated inputs. The inputs are often capital-intensive cotton farming production system, poses a significant risk of debt, bankruptcy, and even farmer suicides if returns do not pay off, especially for small farmers in countries that do not provide economic safety nets. 

 

  • Concerns over Resistance to Pesticides and Adverse Environmental Effects

With the increasing use of GM cotton comes concerns over the insect and weak resistance to pesticides. The ubiquitous use of toxins in GM cotton agriculture is already creating resistance among bollworms, and the emergence of secondary pests has been observed in India’s cotton production. The pest attacks can result in additional pesticide applications being needed, which comes with additional costs for production and environmental damage. 

A similar phenomenon can be observed with weeds becoming resistant to the herbicides used in combination with herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops. A review of 900 studies found that adoption of GM crops initially reduced the use of herbicides, but that resistant weeds later evolved, and resistance to herbicide glyphosate has led to creased usage of the herbicides. As a result, now farmers are spending more on seeds, more on fertiliser and more on insecticides. 

 

  • Monopoly and Seed Ownership Issues

The introduction of GM cotton has raised concerns about farmers’ dependence on the agrochemical industry. Farmers do not save GM seeds from previous harvests because GM cotton plants are F1 hybrids (i.g. the first generation offspring from two distinctly different parent plants). As a result, farmers planting GM cotton must buy new seeds each year to avoid having uneven paint types with lower production. They must also pay the technology fee associated with GM seeds. 

One study estimated that the one company alone owned up to 95% of the cotton seed market in India through its GM seeds. In 2018, 76% of conventional cotton production worldwide was genetically modified. The introduction of GM cotton also has disconnected farmers from the plant breeding process, risk the loss of agricultural know-how that has been passed down for centuries. 

 




Supporting Organic Cotton Can Make Our Future Brighter 

While organic cotton was once seen as a “niche,” today, brands of all sizes are marking its major components of their fibre and material portfolio. More and more brands and retailers are setting targets and making commitments to increase their use of organic cotton, encouraged by growing evidence of the sustainability benefits of fibre and organic farming. 




Through empowering the agricultural community, we believe that we have the capacity and potential to tackle the challenges the agricultural sector is facing today.




If you’d like to learn about the social issues of cotton production in China and India, you can read this article: “Cotton Production; Social Issues in China and India

What are your thoughts on organic cotton, regenerative agriculture and non-GM seeds? Let us know what you think!



Older posts





SHOP FAIR FASHION


SHOP